SAC 181 Operating-Account Checks Used for Tenant Deposit “Refunds”

Trust-account and timing anomalies exposed by "August 28, 2025" checks on SAC 181’s operating account and a September 8, 2025 Columbia postmark contradicting deposit-return timelines.

Document Overview

Charleston County Court of Common Pleas

Case number: 2025-CP-10-05095
strong>Filing Date: December 11, 2025
Document: Exhibit F – SAC 181 Operating-Account Checks Used for Security-Deposit “Refunds” to Plaintiffs
Contents: Two Synovus checks drawn on account “SAC 181_OP” at 8310 Rivers Ave, Suite B, North Charleston (Meridian Residential Group’s office address), dated August 28, 2025 and issued as “Deposit Refund” payments of $1,142.50 each to James McNeil and Meaghan Poyer for 181 Gordon St, filed as Exhibit F in Plaintiffs’ 11/18/2025 Response in Opposition to MRG Investing Company LLC’s Motion to Dismiss and again as Exhibit F in Plaintiffs’ 12/11/2025 Supplemental Memorandum.

Executive Summary

SAC 181 Operating-Account Checks Used for Deposit “Refunds”

This exhibit shows two Synovus checks, each for $1,142.50, drawn on an account styled “SAC 181_OP” (SAC 181’s operating account) at Synovus Bank and listing 8310 Rivers Ave, Suite B, North Charleston, SC 29406—Meridian Residential Group’s office address - as the mailing address, payable separately to James McNeil and Meaghan Poyer as “Deposit Refund” for 181 Gordon St.

The checks are dated August 28, 2025, but Plaintiffs received them in an envelope postmarked September 8, 2025 in Columbia, SC and delivered on September 10, 2025, reinforcing allegations that the deposit return was late under South Carolina law and that earlier “August 28” postmark evidence was falsified.

Because these “refunds” were issued from an operating account rather than a properly titled real-estate trust/escrow account, the exhibit also supports Plaintiffs’ contention that PMIC Tara Bayles and SAC 181 failed to maintain a segregated trust account for tenant security deposits as required by S.C. Code § 40-57-136, highlighting commingling risk and trust-account violations within the broader pattern of retaliatory eviction, falsified documents, and systemic misuse of tenant funds documented here and on the public docket for Charleston SC Court of Common Pleas CP-10-05095.

Media Inquiries

this exhibit or the case in general, contact:
Chris McNeil, Pro Se Plaintiff
Email: Click here to email with web form
Case: 2025-CP-10-05095, Charleston County Court of Common Pleas

Document Access

Co-mingled Checking Account Exhibit

To Top


It appears you don't have a PDF plugin for this browser.


PDF Fallback Unable to view the pdf on your mobile device?

Download the PDF


    Evidence Details

    Scan of Falsified Postmark Envelope and Email

    Scan of Falsified Postmark Envelope and Email

    This pdf includes the page from the pdf scan with filename "MeridianScanner_20250905161321.pdf"
    (filename formula "[Business Name]Scanner_YYYYMMDDHHMMSS].pdf")emailed by Tara Bayles to Chris McNeil September 5, 2025, along with a pdf print of the email itself.

    SAC 181 Operating-Account Checks Used for Tenant Deposit “Refunds”

    SAC 181 Operating-Account Checks Used for Tenant Deposit “Refunds”

    Trust-account and timing anomalies exposed by "August 28, 2025" checks on SAC 181’s operating account and a September 8, 2025 Columbia postmark contradicting deposit-return timelines.